The male bias of a generically-intended masculine pronoun: Evidence from eye-tracking and sentence evaluation T Redl, SL Frank, P De Swart, H De Hoop PloS one 16 (4), e0249309, 2021 | 18* | 2021 |
Processing prescriptively incorrect comparative particles: Evidence from sentence-matching and eye-tracking F Hubers, T Redl, H De Vos, L Reinarz, H De Hoop Frontiers in psychology 11, 186, 2020 | 18 | 2020 |
The processing of the Dutch masculine generic zijn ‘his’ across stereotype contexts: An eye-tracking study T Redl, A Eerland, TJM Sanders PloS one 13 (10), e0205903, 2018 | 18 | 2018 |
Gender-mismatching pronouns in context: The interpretation of possessive pronouns in Dutch and Limburgian J Piepers, T Redl Linguistics in the Netherlands 35 (1), 97-110, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
Masculine generic pronouns as a gender cue in generic statements T Redl, A Szuba, P de Swart, SL Frank, H de Hoop Discourse Processes 59 (10), 828-845, 2022 | 6 | 2022 |
Are second person masculine generics easier to process for men than for women? Evidence from polish A Szuba, T Redl, H De Hoop Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51 (4), 819-845, 2022 | 6 | 2022 |
Masculine generic pronouns: Investigating the processing of an unintended gender cue T Redl Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen, 2021 | 5 | 2021 |
The male bias of a generically-intended personal pronoun in language processing T Redl, SL Frank, P de Swart, H de Hoop PsyArXiv, 2020 | 5 | 2020 |
On the acceptability of the not so dummy auxiliary ‘do’in Dutch C Sert, F Hubers, T Redl, H Hoop Linguistics in the Netherlands 40 (1), 210-229, 2023 | 3 | 2023 |
Processing mismatching gendered possessive pronouns in L1 Dutch and L2 French GT Schoenmakers, T Redl, S Collin, R Versendaal, PJF de Swart, H Hoop | 2 | 2022 |
A psycholinguistic view on stereotypical and grammatical gender: The effects and remedies J Misersky, T Redl Diversiteit. Een multidisciplinaire terreinverkenning, 237-255, 2020 | 2 | 2020 |
Voorbeeldzinnen kunnen het goede voorbeeld geven C Van Herpt, M Van der Meulen, T Redl Levende Talen Magazine 106 (4), 18-21, 2019 | 1 | 2019 |
To each their own: Investigating the Dutch masculine generic zijn ‘his’ across stereotype contexts T Redl | 1 | 2016 |
The not so dummy auxiliary'do'in Dutch FCW Hubers, T Redl, H Hoop Radboud Data Repository, 2023 | | 2023 |
Strange nominative case in topicalized object pronominal relative clauses M Suijkerbuijk, T Redl, H de Hoop Linguistics in the Netherlands 38 (1), 81-97, 2021 | | 2021 |
Neurologe of liever neuroloog? Het effect van vrouwelijke functiebenamingen op de geloofwaardigheid van medisch specialisten E de Cocq, T Redl Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 43 (1), 35-63, 2021 | | 2021 |
Do masculine generic pronouns favor male referents? Evidence from eye-tracking T Redl, P De Swart, S Frank, H De Hoop Discourse Expectations: Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational …, 2019 | | 2019 |
Does grammatical gender matter in addressing? Exploring the effect of gender marking on processing of second-person singular Polish verbs A Szuba, T Redl, H De Hoop the 5th Workshop of the International Network of Address Research (INAR5), 2019 | | 2019 |
Do masculine generic pronouns cause a male bias in online processing? Evidence from eye-tracking T Redl, P De Swart, S Frank, H De Hoop Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2019), 2019 | | 2019 |
Gender-mismatching pronouns in context: The interpretation of Dutch zijn'his' and Limburgian zien'his/its' J Piepers, T Redl the workshop" Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Gender"(ThEGen), 2018 | | 2018 |